Rijal+al+kashi+report+176+free Fixed Jun 2026

Al-Kashi’s original work, titled Ma‘rifat Akhbar al-Rijal (Knowledge of Narrators’ Reports), was not a simple alphabetical list of names. Instead, it was a mas’ala -based (topic-based) collection of traditions from the Imams regarding the praise ( madh ) or condemnation ( dhamm ) of specific companions and narrators.

إختيار معرفة الرجال المعروف برجال الكشي الجزء الأول تحقيق ميرداماد rijal+al+kashi+report+176+free

Over the centuries, leading scholars have proposed various interpretations to reconcile Report 176 with Zurarah’s established reliability: The report serves as a critique of Muhammad bin Sinan

: Narrations in this range frequently highlight the elite status of companions like Salman al-Farisi, Abu Dharr al-Ghifari, Miqdad ibn al-Aswad, and Ammar ibn Yasir. This raises the question: Did the Imam later

The report serves as a critique of Muhammad bin Sinan. While the exact numbering can vary slightly between manuscripts, the standard numbering (used in the Ikhtiyar edition selected by Sheikh Tusi) places the criticism of Muhammad bin Sinan around this entry.

The report contains two seemingly opposite statements: praise for preserving traditions, followed by an order to abandon him. This raises the question: Did the Imam later become displeased with Zurarah? Was the report fabricated? Or is there a hidden meaning?