The argument for "real physics" in aerodynamics is based on the idea that the traditional understanding of the subject is incomplete and inaccurate. Proponents of this approach argue that a more accurate understanding of aerodynamics requires a detailed analysis of the Navier-Stokes equations, which describe the behavior of air in a more realistic way.
In "real physics" models, mathematicians use the concept of . This isn't literal spinning air, but a mathematical way to describe how the air velocity is higher on top than on the bottom. understanding aerodynamics arguing from the real physics pdf
requires air molecules to meet at the trailing edge. The argument for "real physics" in aerodynamics is